• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Stop wasting time looking for files and revisions. Connect your Gmail, DriveDropbox, and Slack accounts and in less than 2 minutes, Dokkio will automatically organize all your file attachments. Learn more and claim your free account.


view abstract

Page history last edited by Lenny 10 years, 8 months ago


Background: An academic medical center added 15 adult hospitalists over the past 2 years.  Many of the new faculty did not have prior experience with billing.  Over the same time, the Department of Internal Medicine recognized that many charges were not being captured due to poor communication with coders.  Despite faculty orientation presentations, many hospitalists did not fully grasp the requirements for attestation documentation or visit levels.  The goal was to improve documentation and coding accuracy to meet compliance standards and develop relationships with assigned coders.

Purpose: To develop an individualized coding education process for hospitalist faculty.

Description: The implementation of a provider coding process was announced in March 2009.  Before that announcement, physicians with community hospitalist experience were enlisted for support.  4 separate presentations on documentation improvement were given over 10 months by the coding educator and designated physician.   A standardized format, charge drop-off site and submission verification checklist was explained to providers. 

To meet the billing group compliance standard of 90% accuracy, physicians were scheduled to meet individually with a coder, coding educator and designated physician twice over a 14 day ward attending block.  Coders entered a minimum of 20 charges submitted by physicians over the first 7 days into “Intellicode”, audit software that provides objective feedback reports on coding accuracy.  Itemized discrepancies were identified.  All identified errors were reviewed with physicians.  Those who achieved > 90% coding accuracy on initial audit “graduated”.  All others met with the same group at the end of the 14 day attending block for re-audit.

3 of 9 audited providers scored > 90% coding accuracy on the 1st week.  The other 6 faculty members ranged from 53.3-87.5%.  All 6 of them scored greater than 90% on follow up audit.  All 9 providers reported feeling comfortable contacting coders or the designated physician with questions.  This process resulted in a dramatic increase in the hospitalists’ clinical collections and work RVUs  without significant changes in inpatient census; 127% increase in monthly collections and 121% increase in monthly wRVUs (suggesting an increase in collections per wRVU).  Hospitalists’ proportion of Department of Internal Medicine collections has increased from 4 to 8% and RVU’s from 7 to 11% over this time, despite an overall departmental increase.

Conclusion: A coordinated charge entry and individualized provider billing education process can develop physician competence in coding, improve coder relationships and lead to a dramatic improvement in clinical collections.


Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.